On March 9, 2012, CIMA organized a working group to discuss approaches to using content analysis within an overall framework for monitoring and evaluation (M&E). The meeting succeeded in generating a lively discussion on that topic as well as on the viability of creating a shared set of indicators to apply across media development projects.
CIMA is grateful for the valuable contributions of the working group participants. We extend particular thanks to Advisory Council Member Craig LaMay, associate professor and faculty associate at Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research, for his skillful moderation of this important topic and to Erich Sommerfeldt, assistant professor at the University of Maryland, for serving as the rapporteur and organizing the discussion into a summary report.
We would also like to acknowledge Susan Abbott, Louis Botello, Sinclair Cornell, KlaraDebeljak, Nick Oatley, LaurnaStrikwerda, Maureen Taylor, and Mark Whitehouse for their insightful presentations, which informed the group’s discussion and structured much of the debate.
We hope that this report contributes to the dialogue on assessing the impact of projects and measuring their effectiveness.On March 9, 2012, CIMA organized a working group to discuss approaches to using content analysis within an overall framework for monitoring and evaluation (M&E). The meeting succeeded in generating a lively discussion on that topic as well as on the viability of creating a shared set of indicators to apply across media development projects.
CIMA is grateful for the valuable contributions of the working group participants. We extend particular thanks to Advisory Council Member Craig LaMay, associate professor and faculty associate at Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research, for his skillful moderation of this important topic and to Erich Sommerfeldt, assistant professor at the University of Maryland, for serving as the rapporteur and organizing the discussion into a summary report.
We would also like to acknowledge Susan Abbott, Louis Botello, Sinclair Cornell, KlaraDebeljak, Nick Oatley, LaurnaStrikwerda, Maureen Taylor, and Mark Whitehouse for their insightful presentations, which informed the group’s discussion and structured much of the debate.
We hope that this report contributes to the dialogue on assessing the impact of projects and measuring their effectiveness.
CIMA is grateful for the valuable contributions of the working group participants. We extend particular thanks to Advisory Council Member Craig LaMay, associate professor and faculty associate at Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research, for his skillful moderation of this important topic and to Erich Sommerfeldt, assistant professor at the University of Maryland, for serving as the rapporteur and organizing the discussion into a summary report.
We would also like to acknowledge Susan Abbott, Louis Botello, Sinclair Cornell, KlaraDebeljak, Nick Oatley, LaurnaStrikwerda, Maureen Taylor, and Mark Whitehouse for their insightful presentations, which informed the group’s discussion and structured much of the debate.
We hope that this report contributes to the dialogue on assessing the impact of projects and measuring the
Blog Post
Comments (0)
Comments are closed for this post.
Related
Publications
Breaking Barriers: A Whole-of-Society Approach to Gender E...
As a valuable resource for the media development community, students and scholars of journalism and communications, and the media industry, this study offers insights that can inspire action to combat gender inequality and promote more inclusive media practices.
Digital Trust Initiatives: Seeking to Reward Journalistic ...
In an online environment increasingly polluted with false information, trust in news has steadily eroded over the years. At the same time, high-quality news has been losing already scarce advertising revenue to clickbait and viral misinformation. Digital trust initiatives, which evaluate and label n...
Chilling Legislation: Tracking the Impact of “Fake News...
As an increasing number of countries have passed legislation meant to combat the spread of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information (MDM), journalists and news organizations around the world are getting caught in the crosshairs.
Related
Blog Posts
How Government Attacks on the Press Exacerbated the Devast...
By Veysel Ok
Two earthquakes struck Turkey and Syria on February 6, devastating the lives of nearly 26 million people. According to official data, over 46,000 people have died as a result of the earthquakes and entire cities were wiped off the map. The World Health Organization (WHO) called the qua...
Covering the Authoritarian Playbook: How Coda Story Gets t...
For years, Russia has been refining its digital authoritarian playbook, taking advantage of technological advancements to silence the regime’s opponents at home and abroad. The information war that accompanied its invasion of Ukraine has shined a stark light on the corrosive effects of these strat...
Rebalancing the Relationship Between Big Tech and News Med...
As the global journalism industry struggles to adapt to shrinking revenue brought on by the failure of traditional business models, Big Tech companies continue to dominate the digital advertising market. This uneven playing field has led policymakers in the US, EU, and Australia to attempt to rebala...
Comments (0)
Comments are closed for this post.